Chase & Co. v. Bean

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Chase & Co. v. Bean

58 N.H. 183

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedAugust 5, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 N.H. 183 (Chase & Co. v. Bean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase & Co. v. Bean, 58 N.H. 183 (N.H. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

An action at law cannot be maintained by copartners to recover a debt which has been discharged by one of them, and paid by a set-off of his separate debt with his assent, when the defendant *184 acted in good faith. Homer v. Wood, 11 Cush. 62; Williams v. Brimhall, 13 Gray 462; Tay v. Ladd, 15 Gray 296; Greeley v. Wyeth, 10 N. H. 15.

Case discharged.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

An action at law cannot be maintained by copartners to recover a debt which has been discharged by one of them, and paid by a set-off of his separate debt with his assent, when the defendant *184 acted in good faith. Homer v. Wood, 11 Cush. 62; Williams v. Brimhall, 13 Gray 462; Tay v. Ladd, 15 Gray 296; Greeley v. Wyeth, 10 N. H. 15.

Case discharged.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.H. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-co-v-bean-nh-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack