Chase & Co. v. Bean

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Chase & Co. v. Bean

58 N.H. 183

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided August 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

An action at law cannot be maintained by copartners to recover a debt which has been discharged by one of them, and paid by a set-off of his separate debt with his assent, when the defendant *184 acted in good faith. Homer v. Wood, 11 Cush. 62; Williams v. Brimhall, 13 Gray 462; Tay v. Ladd, 15 Gray 296; Greeley v. Wyeth, 10 N. H. 15.

Case discharged.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

An action at law cannot be maintained by copartners to recover a debt which has been discharged by one of them, and paid by a set-off of his separate debt with his assent, when the defendant *184 acted in good faith. Homer v. Wood, 11 Cush. 62; Williams v. Brimhall, 13 Gray 462; Tay v. Ladd, 15 Gray 296; Greeley v. Wyeth, 10 N. H. 15.

Case discharged.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Chase & Co. v. Bean, 58 N.H. 183 (N.H. 1877).

Pincite

58 N.H. 183 (Chase & Co. v. Bean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related