Chase Carmen Hunter v. Texas Department of Insurance and David Mattax, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Insurance
Opinion
ACCEPTED
03-14-00737-CV
4378464
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
March 5, 2015 3/5/2015 1:23:53 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE
No. 03-14-00737-cv CLERK
RECEIVED IN
IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/5/2015 1:23:53 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE
Clerk
CHASE CARMEN HUNTER, APPELLANT v. ELEANOR KITZMAN IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE, JULIA RATHGEBER IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE, AND THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, APPELLEES
REQUEST PURSUANT TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 10.3(b)
AND OBJECTION TO THE CLERK’S LETTERS DATED MARCH 2, 2015, AND MARCH 4, 2015, WHICH DENY, IN PART, AND IN FULL, RESPECTIVELY, HUNTER’S MOTION TO EXTEND THE FILING DATE OF HER MOTION FOR REVIEW OF TRIAL COURT’S ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2015, SUSTAINING CONTEST TO MOTION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS
From Cause D-1-GN-13001957 In The 250th District Travis County, Texas, The Honorable John K. Dietz Presiding
Chase Carmen Hunter, pro se 340 S. Lemon Ave. #9039
Walnut, CA 91789
Telephone: 707-706-3647
Facsimile: 703-997-5999
Chase_Hunter@yahoo.com
CERTIFICATION. I, Chase Carmen Hunter, state under penalty of perjury that the following facts and argument are true and correct.
March 5, 2015
OBJECTION TO THE CLERK’S LETTERS DATED MARCH 2, 2015, AND MARCH 4, 2015 The Appellant, herein referred to as “Hunter”, filed a motion for a 60-day filing extension with this court on March 1, 2015. The clerk of this court (“Clerk”) responded to said motion by sending Hunter a letter on March 2, 2015, stating that said motion was denied in part by this court. Hunter objects to her motion being dispensed with by a letter from the Clerk and not by a court order.
Hunter filed a motion for a 60-day filing extension with this court on March 3, 2015. The clerk of this court (“Clerk”) responded to said motion by sending Hunter a letter on March 4, 2015, stating that said motion was denied by this court. Hunter objects to her
motion being dispensed with by a letter from the Clerk and not by a court order.
Hunter objects to the Clerk dispensing with Hunter’s two aforementioned motions in violation of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure (“TRAP”) 10.3(a) et seq. These two motions were not to be heard or determined “until 10 days after the motion was filed”.
For the aforementioned reasons, Hunter requests that these Clerk’s aforementioned letters be stricken. TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 10.3(b)
Hunter requests that the two aforementioned motions be dispensed with by a court order signed by at least one judge.
Notwithstanding the fact that the two aforementioned letters sent by the Clerk to Hunter (“Clerk Letters”) establish that the two aforementioned motions were not dispensed with by the Court and were only handled by the Clerk, Hunter requests that the two aforementioned motions be reconsidered in accordance with TRAP 10.3(b) in the event that this court believes that the two
Clerk Letters satisfy minimum guidelines to be classified as court orders.
Hunter also requests that this court provide a written explanation establishing the facts and the applicable law relied upon if this court classifies the Clerk Letters as court orders. WHEREFORE, the Appellant requests that the relief requested be granted. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Chase Carmen Hunter
Chase Carmen Hunter Appellant, pro se 340 S. Walnut Ave. #9039 Walnut, CA 91789 Tel: 707-706-3647, Fax: 703-997-5999 Email: Chase_Hunter@yahoo.com
CERTIFICATION
I, Chase Carmen Hunter, swear under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct.
__________________ 3/5/2015 Chase Carmen Hunter
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Request was served upon the parties shown below as indicated:
Cynthia A. Morales Assistant Attorney General By Email on March 5, 2015 at Cynthia.Morales@texasattorneygeneral.gov
Chase Carmen Hunter
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chase Carmen Hunter v. Texas Department of Insurance and David Mattax, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Insurance (Chase Carmen Hunter v. Texas Department of Insurance and David Mattax, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.