Chase Bank v. Acosta
890 P.2d 1152, 181 Ariz. 367, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 20
This text of 890 P.2d 1152 (Chase Bank v. Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chase Bank v. Acosta, 890 P.2d 1152, 181 Ariz. 367, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 20 (Ark. 1995).
Opinion
ORDER
It appearing to the Court that the grant of review in this case was improvident,
IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for review is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for attorneys’ fees by Chase Bank of Arizona is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for attorneys’ fees by Joe and Aurora Acosta is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
890 P.2d 1152, 181 Ariz. 367, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-bank-v-acosta-ariz-1995.