Chasan, B. v. Superior Ct. of Pennsylvania
This text of Chasan, B. v. Superior Ct. of Pennsylvania (Chasan, B. v. Superior Ct. of Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
BRUCE J. CHASAN, ESQ., : No. 10 EM 2021 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : WILLIAM H. PLATT, RETIRED SUPERIOR : COURT JUDGE, SUSAN PEIKES : GANTMAN, SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE : MARIA MCLAUGHLIN, SUPERIOR COURT : JUDGE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Prohibition and/or Mandamus” is
DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the jurists’ names from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chasan, B. v. Superior Ct. of Pennsylvania, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chasan-b-v-superior-ct-of-pennsylvania-pa-2021.