Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 383

United States Customs Court·Decided March 29, 1956·No. No. 59793; protest 238486-K (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of scrap battery lead which has no value in the condition as imported but must be remanufactured by melting; that said merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in Abstract 58127; and that the regulations promulgated in pursuance of Public Laws 869 and 211 have been complied with. Upon the record presented, it was held that the scrap lead is entitled to free entry under Public Laws 869 and 211, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of scrap battery lead which has no value in the condition as imported but must be remanufactured by melting; that said merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in Abstract 58127; and that the regulations promulgated in pursuance of Public Laws 869 and 211 have been complied with. Upon the record presented, it was held that the scrap lead is entitled to free entry under Public Laws 869 and 211, as claimed.

Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 383 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 383 (Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.