Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 383

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 29, 1956

DocketNo. 59793; protest 238486-K (Philadelphia)

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 383 (Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 383 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of scrap battery lead which has no value in the condition as imported but must be remanufactured by melting; that said merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in Abstract 58127; and that the regulations promulgated in pursuance of Public Laws 869 and 211 have been complied with. Upon the record presented, it was held that the scrap lead is entitled to free entry under Public Laws 869 and 211, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of scrap battery lead which has no value in the condition as imported but must be remanufactured by melting; that said merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in Abstract 58127; and that the regulations promulgated in pursuance of Public Laws 869 and 211 have been complied with. Upon the record presented, it was held that the scrap lead is entitled to free entry under Public Laws 869 and 211, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cust. Ct. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chas-kurz-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.