Chas. B. Chrystal Co. v. United States
This text of 19 Cust. Ct. 156 (Chas. B. Chrystal Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[157]*157Opinion by
At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of powdered talc in bags similar in all material respects to that the subject of Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. v. United States (34 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 360). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that in liquidating the entries the value per ton of 2,240 pounds of talc for classification purposes must be determined on the basis of the total dutiable value of the talc, including the bags, and the official gross landed weight of the talc and the bags, in order to find whether or not the talc comes within the classification of talc valued at not more than $14 per ton, dutiable at the rate of 17% percent ad valorem, rather than as talc valued at more than that amount, dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, determine the rate of duty applicable to said merchandise, and make refund accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Cust. Ct. 156, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chas-b-chrystal-co-v-united-states-cusc-1947.