Charytz v. Kasinski
This text of 282 A.D. 891 (Charytz v. Kasinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action in ejectment, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant Kasinski, dismissing the complaint on the opening of his counsel. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, on the record presented, it was error to dismiss the complaint. (Bunkel V. City of New York, 282 App. Div. 173; Hoffman House v. Foote, 172 H. Y. 348.) Holán, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 891, 125 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charytz-v-kasinski-nyappdiv-1953.