Chartock v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chartock v. Wood

267 A.D.2d 236, 699 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12517

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 236 (Chartock v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chartock v. Wood, 267 A.D.2d 236, 699 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County [237]*237(McNulty, J.), entered June 30, 1998, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family. Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the instant petition in order to ensure that all relevant files would be before it. The dismissal was without prejudice to an application to reinstate an earlier proceeding seeking the same relief under docket number V-2691-95, which contained, inter alia, full evaluations of the parties. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County [237]*237(McNulty, J.), entered June 30, 1998, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family. Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the instant petition in order to ensure that all relevant files would be before it. The dismissal was without prejudice to an application to reinstate an earlier proceeding seeking the same relief under docket number V-2691-95, which contained, inter alia, full evaluations of the parties. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 236, 699 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chartock-v-wood-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack