Chartier v. Sherman

672 So. 2d 604, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4308, 1996 WL 194349
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 1996·No. No. 96-463·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

TMs case comes before tMs court on a petition for common law certiorari to review a decision of the circuit court acting in its appellate capacity. The underlying action involves a commercial lease. During the pendency of a suit for possession brought by Sherman, the landlord, he moved for payment of rent pursuant to § 83.232 Fla.Stat. (1993). Under the statute, rent is to be paid into the court registry during the pendency of the litigation. However, pursuant to a stipulation between the attorneys, the parties agreed that payments would be paid directly to the landlord. The tenant, Chartier, faded to abide by the terms of the stipulated agreement and, after notice, the trial court entered a default as permitted by § 83.232(5). Subsequently, the trial court entered a writ of possession in favor of the landlord. The circuit court, in its appellate capacity, ultimately sustained the writ of possession. We find there was no departure from the essential requirements of the law and therefore, the petition for certiorari is demed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chartier v. Sherman, 672 So. 2d 604, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4308, 1996 WL 194349 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

672 So. 2d 604 (Chartier v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

34TH STREET, LLC v. PRO KARTING EXPERIENCE, INC.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
214 Main Street Corp. v. Tanksley
947 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)