Charter Communications VI, LLC v. Eleazer

Fourth Circuit

Charter Communications VI, LLC v. Eleazer

445 F. App'x 651

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 9, 2011

DocketNo. 10-1804

StatusPublished

This text of 445 F. App'x 651 (Charter Communications VI, LLC v. Eleazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charter Communications VI, LLC v. Eleazer, 445 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Eleazer and MNE Broadcasting, LLC, appeal from the district court’s orders denying their motion to set aside a default judgment and their motion for a continuance in the underlying civil action. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no error in the district court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charter Commc’ns VI, LLC v. Eleazer, No. 5:04-cv-01204, 2010 WL 2509841 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 8, 2009, June 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Eleazer and MNE Broadcasting, LLC, appeal from the district court’s orders denying their motion to set aside a default judgment and their motion for a continuance in the underlying civil action. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no error in the district court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charter Commc’ns VI, LLC v. Eleazer, No. 5:04-cv-01204, 2010 WL 2509841 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 8, 2009, June 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F. App'x 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charter-communications-vi-llc-v-eleazer-ca4-2011.