Charrette v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of Charrette v. Commissioner of Social Security (Charrette v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DENISE CHARRETTE, Case No. 24-cv-06392-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. L
13 This social security appeal was filed by Denise Charrette, pro se, on behalf of her 23-year- 14 || oldson, Anjele Jaame McCullough. Dkt. No. 1. There is no indication that Denise Charrette is an 3 15 || attorney, and she may not represent her son. See Civil L.R. 3-9(a) (“Any party representing him a 16 || or herself without an attorney must appear personally and may not delegate that duty to any other 2 17 || person who is not a member of the bar of this Court.”); see also Grizzell v. San Elijo Elementary Z 18 || School, 110 F.4th 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2024) (“a parent may not proceed pro se on behalf of her 19 || children.”). 20 Plaintiff Anjele Jaame McCullough will have 60 days from the date of this order to appear 21 || through an attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court. If an attorney does not appear on 22 || his behalf, the case will be dismissed without prejudice. The application to proceed in forma 23 || pauperis, Dkt. No. 2, is denied because it was completed by Denise Charrette as the applicant and 24 || was also incomplete. 25 IT ISSO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: September 23, 2024 27 JAMES#pPONATO 28 Unitedfftates District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charrette v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charrette-v-commissioner-of-social-security-cand-2024.