Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Charney v. Cohen

Charney v. Cohen

112 A. 893, 95 N.J.L. 538, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 143
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Charney v. Cohen. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 N.J.L. 381 →
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 1921·Published

Opinion

Pee Cuejam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the-Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchard, PARKER, Bergen, Kaliscit, KatzeNBAoh, White, Heppen-HEIMER, WILLIAMS,’ TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charney v. Cohen, 112 A. 893, 95 N.J.L. 538, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 143 (N.J. 1921).

112 A. 893 (Charney v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.