Charlton v. Black Diamond Properties

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Charlton v. Black Diamond Properties

17 So. 3d 790, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 2009 WL 2475003

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 14, 2009

DocketNos. 5D08-3109, 5D08-3110, 5D08-3111

StatusPublished

This text of 17 So. 3d 790 (Charlton v. Black Diamond Properties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charlton v. Black Diamond Properties, 17 So. 3d 790, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 2009 WL 2475003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal from a final order requiring Appellants to pay attorneys’ fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2008), related to a motion for sanctions which they filed and pursued against Appellees and their attorneys. On appeal, Appellees concede that they are not entitled to six hours of fees for time spent at the deposition of two witnesses, Olsen and Taylor, or to twelve hours for attending the fee hearing itself. Finding no other error, we affirm the order on appeal in all other respects, and remand for entry of a corrected order consistent with Appellees’ concessions.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON, JJ., and PLEUS, JR., R., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal from a final order requiring Appellants to pay attorneys’ fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2008), related to a motion for sanctions which they filed and pursued against Appellees and their attorneys. On appeal, Appellees concede that they are not entitled to six hours of fees for time spent at the deposition of two witnesses, Olsen and Taylor, or to twelve hours for attending the fee hearing itself. Finding no other error, we affirm the order on appeal in all other respects, and remand for entry of a corrected order consistent with Appellees’ concessions.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON, JJ., and PLEUS, JR., R., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 So. 3d 790, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 2009 WL 2475003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlton-v-black-diamond-properties-fladistctapp-2009.