Charlotte L. Block, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf v. Detroit Harbor Terminals, Inc., a Corporation, Charlotte L. Block, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf v. Detroit Terminals, Inc., a Corporation

Sixth Circuit

Charlotte L. Block, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf v. Detroit Harbor Terminals, Inc., a Corporation, Charlotte L. Block, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf v. Detroit Terminals, Inc., a Corporation

179 F.2d 236

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 13, 1950

Docket10916_1

StatusPublished

This text of 179 F.2d 236 (Charlotte L. Block, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf v. Detroit Harbor Terminals, Inc., a Corporation, Charlotte L. Block, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf v. Detroit Terminals, Inc., a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charlotte L. Block, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf v. Detroit Harbor Terminals, Inc., a Corporation, Charlotte L. Block, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf v. Detroit Terminals, Inc., a Corporation, 179 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

179 F.2d 236

Charlotte L. BLOCK, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf, Appellants,
v.
DETROIT HARBOR TERMINALS, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.
Charlotte L. BLOCK, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf, Appellants,
v.
DETROIT TERMINALS, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.

No. 10898.

No. 10916.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 9, 1949.

Writ of Certiorari Denied March 13, 1950.

See 70 S.Ct. 572.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Thomas P. Thornton, Judge.

Meyer Abrams, Chicago, Ill., Harris W. Wienner, Detroit, Mich., Meyer Abrams, Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Hugh Francis, J. Thomas Smith, Detroit, Mich., Hugh Francis, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated causes were heard upon the transcripts of record, briefs, and arguments of counsel, and the court being of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the records,

It is ordered and adjudged that the orders and decrees appealed from be and the same are affirmed and the causes remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

179 F.2d 236

Charlotte L. BLOCK, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf, Appellants,
v.
DETROIT HARBOR TERMINALS, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.
Charlotte L. BLOCK, Harold Block, Max N. Block, Sylvia B. Fish, Bernard Shulman, Fred H. Wolf, and Lillian Wolf, Appellants,
v.
DETROIT TERMINALS, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.

No. 10898.

No. 10916.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

December 9, 1949.

Writ of Certiorari Denied March 13, 1950.

See 70 S.Ct. 572.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Thomas P. Thornton, Judge.

Meyer Abrams, Chicago, Ill., Harris W. Wienner, Detroit, Mich., Meyer Abrams, Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Hugh Francis, J. Thomas Smith, Detroit, Mich., Hugh Francis, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated causes were heard upon the transcripts of record, briefs, and arguments of counsel, and the court being of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the records,

It is ordered and adjudged that the orders and decrees appealed from be and the same are affirmed and the causes remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 F.2d 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlotte-l-block-harold-block-max-n-block-sylvia-b-fish-bernard-ca6-1950.