Charlotte James v. United States of America, Kathy Butler, Individually and as Surviving Wife and Heir of Eddy Butler v. United States of America, Susan B. Clardy, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Bridget Marie Clardy and Kenneth Clardy v. United States
This text of 799 F.2d 236 (Charlotte James v. United States of America, Kathy Butler, Individually and as Surviving Wife and Heir of Eddy Butler v. United States of America, Susan B. Clardy, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Bridget Marie Clardy and Kenneth Clardy v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charlotte JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Kathy BUTLER, Individually and as Surviving Wife and Heir of
Eddy Butler, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Susan B. CLARDY, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of the
Minors, Bridget Marie Clardy and Kenneth Clardy,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 83-2276, 83-4522.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 12, 1986.
T. John Ward, Richard F. Hightower, Sharp, Ward, Ross, McDaniel & Starr, Longview, Tex., Old & Old, Mount Pleasant, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
William J. Cornelius, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Tyler, Tex., Thomas L. Jones, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Bob Wortham, U.S. Atty., Beaumont, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.*
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM:
In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 3116, 92 L.Ed.2d 483, which reversed our judgment and decision at 760 F.2d 590 (5th Cir.1985), we affirm the judgments of the district courts in these cases.
Judge Jones was not a member of the court when this case was submitted to the court en banc and did not participate in this decision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
799 F.2d 236, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlotte-james-v-united-states-of-america-kathy-butler-individually-and-ca5-1986.