Charlotte E. Ostrander, Etc. v. United States
This text of 178 F.2d 923 (Charlotte E. Ostrander, Etc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
178 F.2d 923
Charlotte E. OSTRANDER, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 124, Docket 21509.
United States Court of Appeals
Second circuit.
Argued Jan. 10, 1950.
Decided Jan. 10, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Lexow & Jenkins, Suffern, N.Y. (David H. Moses, Suffern, N.Y., of counsel), for Plaintiff-appellant.
Irving H. Saypol, United States Attorney, New York City (Nathan Skolnik, Assistant United States Attorney, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.
Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed in open court on authority of United States v. Feres, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 535.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 F.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlotte-e-ostrander-etc-v-united-states-ca2-1950.