Charlotte-Concord Bus Line v. Gibbons Transfer Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Charlotte-Concord Bus Line v. Gibbons Transfer Co.

140 S.E. 300, 194 N.C. 809, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 247

DecidedNovember 30, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 140 S.E. 300 (Charlotte-Concord Bus Line v. Gibbons Transfer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charlotte-Concord Bus Line v. Gibbons Transfer Co., 140 S.E. 300, 194 N.C. 809, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 247 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe plaintiff brought .suit to recover damages for injury to its bus alleged to have been caused by tbe defendant’s negligence. Tbe defendant answered, denying tbe plaintiff’s allegations, and set up a cross-action for tbe recovery of damages against tbe plaintiff. Tbe alleged causes arose from a collision on a public highway between tbe plaintiff’s bus and tbe defendant’s moving van. Appropriate issues were submitted upon both causes and were answered in favor of tbe plaintiff.

We find upon an examination of tbe record that the controversy between tbe parties has been tried and determined in substantial compliance with tbe controlling principles of law and that tbe appellant has shown no sufficient cause for our disturbing the verdict or tbe judgment.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Tbe plaintiff brought .suit to recover damages for injury to its bus alleged to have been caused by tbe defendant’s negligence. Tbe defendant answered, denying tbe plaintiff’s allegations, and set up a cross-action for tbe recovery of damages against tbe plaintiff. Tbe alleged causes arose from a collision on a public highway between tbe plaintiff’s bus and tbe defendant’s moving van. Appropriate issues were submitted upon both causes and were answered in favor of tbe plaintiff.

We find upon an examination of tbe record that the controversy between tbe parties has been tried and determined in substantial compliance with tbe controlling principles of law and that tbe appellant has shown no sufficient cause for our disturbing the verdict or tbe judgment.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 S.E. 300, 194 N.C. 809, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlotte-concord-bus-line-v-gibbons-transfer-co-nc-1927.