Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk
This text of Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk (Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 7, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00961-CV ——————————— CHARLIE WILLIE JONES, JR., Appellant V. CHRISTOHPER R. FUNK, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1064842
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Charlie Willie Jones, Jr., proceeding pro se, timely filed a notice
of appeal on November 17, 2015, from the order denying writ of re-entry, signed by
the trial court on November 17, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. However, appellant
has neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§
51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2015);
Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and
Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158
(Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).
After being notified by the Clerk of this Court on December 14, 2015, that
this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee, appellant filed a
“Request to Dismiss Appeal” on December 16, 2015, because “this is not a final
order.” TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.1(a)(1), 42.3. We construe this request as a motion to
dismiss on the ground that the order appealed from was not a final order. Also,
though there is no certificate of conference with the motion, this motion has been on
file with the Court for more than 10 days and no party has responded to the motion.
See id. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no
opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlie-willie-jones-jr-v-christopher-r-funk-texapp-2016.