Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 7, 2016·No. 01-15-00961-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 7, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).

After being notified by the Clerk of this Court on December 14, 2015, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee, appellant filed a “Request to Dismiss Appeal” on December 16, 2015, because “this is not a final order.” TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.1(a)(1), 42.3. We construe this request as a motion to dismiss on the ground that the order appealed from was not a final order. Also, though there is no certificate of conference with the motion, this motion has been on file with the Court for more than 10 days and no party has responded to the motion. See id. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk (Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.