Charlie Williams A/K/A Charles Williams v. Reed Elsevier Inc. D/B/A Lexis Nexis
This text of Charlie Williams A/K/A Charles Williams v. Reed Elsevier Inc. D/B/A Lexis Nexis (Charlie Williams A/K/A Charles Williams v. Reed Elsevier Inc. D/B/A Lexis Nexis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-03-072-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
___________________________________________________________________
CHARLIE WILLIAMS A/K/A CHARLES
WILLIAMS, ET AL. , Appellants,
v.
REED ELSEVIER, INC. D/B/A LEXIS NEXIS , Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
On appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 4
of Harris County, Texas
___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, CHARLIE WILLIAMS A/K/A CHARLES WILLIAMS, ET AL. , attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 721,654 . Judgment in this cause was signed on September 30, 2002 . A timely motion for new trial was filed on October 22, 2002. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants' notice of appeal was due on December 29, 2002 , but was not filed until January 3, 2003 .
Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellants have failed to correct the defect.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants' failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellants' failure to correct the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 6th day of March, 2003 .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charlie Williams A/K/A Charles Williams v. Reed Elsevier Inc. D/B/A Lexis Nexis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlie-williams-aka-charles-williams-v-reed-elsev-texapp-2003.