Charlie J. Bond v. Herman C. Davis, Warden Fort Pillow State Farm

767 F.2d 919, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14326, 1985 WL 13435
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 1985
Docket84-5754
StatusUnpublished

This text of 767 F.2d 919 (Charlie J. Bond v. Herman C. Davis, Warden Fort Pillow State Farm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charlie J. Bond v. Herman C. Davis, Warden Fort Pillow State Farm, 767 F.2d 919, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14326, 1985 WL 13435 (6th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

767 F.2d 919

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
CHARLIE J. BOND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HERMAN C. DAVIS, WARDEN FORT PILLOW STATE FARM, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

84-5754

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

6/12/85

W.D.Tenn.

APPEAL DISMISSED

ORDER

BEFORE: KENNEDY, CONTIE, and MILBURN, Circuit Judges.

The present action is before this Court on the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's appeal from the district court's entry of judgment on July 10, 1984. The plaintiff has not responded to this motion to dismiss. The plaintiff filed an appeal to this Court on August 10, 1984.

Pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a notice of appeal from a district court judgment, in a civil action, must be filed within 30 days from the date of entry of the judgment. Browder v. Director, Department of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 265 (1978); Denley v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. and Malcom Bailey, 733 F.2d 39 (6th Cir. 1984). Because the plaintiff's appeal was filed 31 days rather than 30 days after the district court's entry of judgment, this Court lacks jurisdiction.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's appeal be and hereby is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.
434 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1978)
In Re Butcher
767 F.2d 919 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 F.2d 919, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14326, 1985 WL 13435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlie-j-bond-v-herman-c-davis-warden-fort-pillow-ca6-1985.