Charlie D. Hawkins v. Mark J. Solomon and Sharon Solomon D/B/A All Auto Insurance Inc. D/B/A Assurnet Insurance

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 10, 2015·No. 05-14-01595-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 10, 2015

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01595-CV

CHARLIE D. HAWKINS, Appellant V. MARK J. SOLOMON AND SHARON SOLOMON D/B/A ALL AUTO INSURANCE INC. D/B/A ASSURNET INSURANCE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-09318

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright This Court may dismiss an appeal for failure to file a clerk's record if the reason is

because an appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing

the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On August 6, 2015, the District Clerk of Dallas County

informed the Court that the clerk’s record had been prepared but was being held for non-payment

of fees. By letter dated August 7, 2015, the Court instructed appellant to file, within ten days,

either written verification that appellant had paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk's fee or

written documentation that appellant had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment

of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within the

time requested may result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(b). As of today’s date, appellant has not filed a response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b)–(c).

141595F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

CHARLIE D. HAWKINS, Appellant On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-14-01595-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-09318. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. MARK J. SOLOMON AND SHARON Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart SOLOMON D/B/A ALL AUTO participating. INSURANCE INC. D/B/A ASSURNET INSURANCE, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees MARK J. SOLOMON AND SHARON SOLOMON D/B/A ALL AUTO INSURANCE INC. D/B/A ASSURNET INSURANCE recover their costs of this appeal from appellant CHARLIE D. HAWKINS.

Judgment entered September 10, 2015.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charlie D. Hawkins v. Mark J. Solomon and Sharon Solomon D/B/A All Auto Insurance Inc. D/B/A Assurnet Insurance, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Charlie D. Hawkins v. Mark J. Solomon and Sharon Solomon D/B/A All Auto Insurance Inc. D/B/A Assurnet Insurance (Charlie D. Hawkins v. Mark J. Solomon and Sharon Solomon D/B/A All Auto Insurance Inc. D/B/A Assurnet Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.