Charlie D. Altman v. State of Florida
This text of Charlie D. Altman v. State of Florida (Charlie D. Altman v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 4, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
Nos. 3D25-0906, 3D25-0907 & 3D25-0908 Lower Tribunal Nos. 18-CF-100-A-K, 18-CF-443-A-K, 18-CF-793-A-K ________________
Charlie D. Altman, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
Appeals under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark Wilson, Judge.
Charlie D. Altman, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GORDO, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Altman v. State, 422 So. 3d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025);
Altman v. State, 394 So. 3d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024); see also State v. Stabile,
443 So. 2d 398, 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (“The law of the case precludes
relitigation of all issues necessarily ruled upon by the court . . . . A per curiam
affirmance does establish the law of the case.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charlie D. Altman v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlie-d-altman-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.