Charlie C. White v. State
This text of Charlie C. White v. State (Charlie C. White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charlie C. White is awaiting trial for possession of a controlled substance. White has filed a pro se notice of appeal from the district court's order overruling White's motion to suppress evidence.
This Court does not have jurisdiction to consider an interlocutory appeal unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). There is no law permitting interlocutory review of an order overruling a motion to suppress evidence. If convicted, White may challenge the trial court's order at that time.
The appeal is dismissed.
___________________________________________
Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: July 24, 2009
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charlie C. White v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charlie-c-white-v-state-texapp-2009.