Charlie Bob Wesley v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Charlie Bob Wesley v. United States

384 F.2d 100, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4862

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 16, 1967

Docket21178_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 384 F.2d 100 (Charlie Bob Wesley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charlie Bob Wesley v. United States, 384 F.2d 100, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4862 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was ample evidence to support appellant’s conviction of forgery. His opportunity rendered him a natural object of suspicion. His identification as the forger by the Government’s handwriting expert was convincing, and he offered no rebuttal expert testimony.

There is no support whatsoever for appellant’s contention that the trial judge demonstrated bias.

Appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated when handwriting exemplars were secured from him. Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 266-267, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI