Charley v. Office of the Attorney General
This text of Charley v. Office of the Attorney General (Charley v. Office of the Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6904
TIMOTHY CHARLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General; MARY S. WILLIAMS, Assistant Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (6:10-cv-01204-CMC)
Submitted: November 17, 2010 Decided: December 9, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Charley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Timothy Charley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Charley v. Office of the Att’y Gen., No. 6:10-cv-01204-CMC
(D.S.C. June 21, 2010). We deny Charley’s motion for discovery
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charley v. Office of the Attorney General, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charley-v-office-of-the-attorney-general-ca4-2010.