Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.

76 S.E. 360, 139 Ga. 20, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 509
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 15, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 360 (Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co., 76 S.E. 360, 139 Ga. 20, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 509 (Ga. 1912).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Where a defendant may have a remedy over against another, and vouches him into court by giving notice of the pendency of a suit, the judgment rendered therein will be conclusive upon the party vouched, as to the amount and right of the plaintiff to recover. Civil Code, § 5821.

2. The judgment in such a case is not An adjudication of the question whether the primary defendant is entitled to recover against his vouchee, upon a suit brought by him against the latter after a recovery has been had in the first action.

3. Where a widow brought against a railway company an action to recover damages for the negligent homicide of her husband, and alleged as one ground of negligence the maintenance of a platform dangerously near a railroad track, and the defendant served a compress company, alleged to be the owner of such platform, with a copy of the petition and a written avouehment, stating that the suit was proceeding upon the theory that there was negligence in the maintenance of the platform of the compress company, by reason of the protrusion of one of the sleepers so as to be too close to the railway track, notifying the compress company of the suit, and vouching it to defend the same, no provision of law exists by which the vouchee can, by petition to the presiding judge, have the question of its liability over determined in advance of the original suit, and obtain an order declaring the vouchee to be relieved from any . obligation to defend the suit, and that such avouehment is null and void, and setting it aside and dismissing the vouchee from any participation in the suit.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Register v. Stone's Independent Oil Distributors, Inc.
179 S.E.2d 68 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Woolfolk Chemical Works, Ltd.
178 S.E.2d 710 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Southern Railway Co. v. Acme Fast Freight Inc.
19 S.E.2d 286 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Bryant v. Guaranty Life Insurance
150 S.E. 596 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 360, 139 Ga. 20, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charleston-western-carolina-railway-co-v-union-warehouse-compress-co-ga-1912.