Charleston v. Early

89 S.E. 78, 18 Ga. App. 212, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 237
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 31, 1916
Docket7081
StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 78 (Charleston v. Early) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charleston v. Early, 89 S.E. 78, 18 Ga. App. 212, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 237 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

As admitted by counsel for plaintiff in error in his brief, only a question of fact is involved in this case. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury upon the issue of fact; and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 78, 18 Ga. App. 212, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charleston-v-early-gactapp-1916.