Charleston K. Larry v. State
This text of Charleston K. Larry v. State (Charleston K. Larry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CHARLESTON KAREEM LARRY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-3247
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 24, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Renee A. Roche, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises two points on appeal, only one of which merits discussion.
Immediately prior to sentencing, the trial court speculated about Appellant’s past behavior
for which there was no record basis. Moreover, the subject matter of the past behavior was not relevant to the sentence. Under these circumstances, the sentence must be
reversed and remanded for re-sentencing before a different judge.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charleston K. Larry v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charleston-k-larry-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.