Charleston Business Machines v. State Tax Department

14 Ct. Cl. 161
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedJune 30, 1982
DocketCC-82-54
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ct. Cl. 161 (Charleston Business Machines v. State Tax Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charleston Business Machines v. State Tax Department, 14 Ct. Cl. 161 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant seeks payment of the sum of $139.95 for a missing Victor 100 calculator which had been loaned to the Procurement Office of the State Tax Department.

At the hearing, Mr. Jerry Lewis, owner of Charleston Business Machines, stated that the cost of the machine to his com[162]*162pany was “probably about $95.00 to $98.00.” Counsel for the respondent offered no evidence to refute the claim.

It is obvious that a bailment situation existed between claimant and respondent. While a bailee is not liable for loss of property caused by robbery, Tancil v. Seaton, 69 Va. 601 (1877), a bailee is liable where he fails to exercise ordinary care for the safety of property in his hands. 2B M.J., Bailments, §11.

The Court finds that the respondent did not meet that standard of ordinary care in regard to the calculator which was on loan from the claimant, and, based on the foregoing facts, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $95.00.

Award of $95.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tancil v. Seaton
69 Va. 601 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Ct. Cl. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charleston-business-machines-v-state-tax-department-wvctcl-1982.