Charles Worth v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan

Sixth Circuit

Charles Worth v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan

277 F.2d 457

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 20, 1960

Docket13964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 F.2d 457 (Charles Worth v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Worth v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan, 277 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel for appellant, and counsel for the appellee in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed on the Memorandum of Judge Levin denying the petition for the writ of habeas corpus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel for appellant, and counsel for the appellee in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed on the Memorandum of Judge Levin denying the petition for the writ of habeas corpus.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 F.2d 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-worth-v-william-h-bannan-warden-state-prison-of-southern-ca6-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack