Charles Worth v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan

Sixth Circuit

Charles Worth v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan

277 F.2d 457

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 20, 1960·No. 13964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel for appellant, and counsel for the appellee in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed on the Memorandum of Judge Levin denying the petition for the writ of habeas corpus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel for appellant, and counsel for the appellee in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed on the Memorandum of Judge Levin denying the petition for the writ of habeas corpus.

Charles Worth v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan, 277 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

277 F.2d 457 (Charles Worth v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related