Charles Willingham v. Buncombe County Correctional

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6539

CHARLES WILLINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BUNCOMBE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (1:12-cv-00383-RJC)

Submitted: October 15, 2013 Decided: October 17, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Willingham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles D. Willingham appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Willingham’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Willingham has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny Willingham’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED