Charles Williams v. Sgt. T. Crosson
This text of 688 F. App'x 189 (Charles Williams v. Sgt. T. Crosson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles A. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Williams v. Crosson, No. 5:14-ct-03308-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
688 F. App'x 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-williams-v-sgt-t-crosson-ca4-2017.