Charles Williams v. Sgt. T. Crosson

688 F. App'x 189
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2017·No. 16-7231·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Williams v. Crosson, No. 5:14-ct-03308-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Williams v. Sgt. T. Crosson, 688 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2017).

688 F. App'x 189 (Charles Williams v. Sgt. T. Crosson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Archy v. Troxler
D. Delaware, 2021