Charles Weissman v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami

Fifth Circuit

Charles Weissman v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami

327 F.2d 1004

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 25, 1964

Docket20888

StatusPublished

This text of 327 F.2d 1004 (Charles Weissman v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Weissman v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami, 327 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment in favor of the appellee Banks, the defendants below. We find no justification for holding that there were any disputed issues of fact that would have warranted a recovery by the appellant on any theory of the case advanced by him.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment in favor of the appellee Banks, the defendants below. We find no justification for holding that there were any disputed issues of fact that would have warranted a recovery by the appellant on any theory of the case advanced by him.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 F.2d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-weissman-v-boulevard-national-bank-of-miami-ca5-1964.