Charles Weissman v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami

Fifth Circuit

Charles Weissman v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami

327 F.2d 1004

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 25, 1964·No. 20888·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment in favor of the appellee Banks, the defendants below. We find no justification for holding that there were any disputed issues of fact that would have warranted a recovery by the appellant on any theory of the case advanced by him.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment in favor of the appellee Banks, the defendants below. We find no justification for holding that there were any disputed issues of fact that would have warranted a recovery by the appellant on any theory of the case advanced by him.

The judgment is affirmed.

Charles Weissman v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami, 327 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

327 F.2d 1004 (Charles Weissman v. Boulevard National Bank of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.