Charles W. Toomey v. Peter G. Nash

491 F.2d 729
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 1974
Docket73-1590
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 491 F.2d 729 (Charles W. Toomey v. Peter G. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles W. Toomey v. Peter G. Nash, 491 F.2d 729 (8th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On October 15, 1969, Charles W. Toomey was discharged from federal service as a field attorney with the National Labor Relations Board for “[rjepeated acts of conduct unbecoming a professional employee of the National Labor Relations Board.” His discharge followed notice of the proposed action, an agency hearing, and, because Toomey was a veterans’ preference eligible employee, a proceeding before the Civil Service Commission. 5 C.F.R. § 752.-03(1973). The discharge was approved by the Commission Board of Appeals and Review, whereupon Toomey filed a suit in the nature of mandamus and for declaratory relief in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Judge Collinson granted summary judgment in favor of appellees.

We have carefully reviewed the record. The findings of the District Court are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears in the case. Accordingly, we affirm on Judge Collin-son’s well-reasoned opinion. See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
491 F.2d 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-w-toomey-v-peter-g-nash-ca8-1974.