Charles W. Eaden v. State
Opinion
FILE COPY
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 29, 2021
No. 04-19-00871-CR
Charles W. EADEN, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR4480 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
ORDER On December 30, 2020, we abated this appeal to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute his appeal, whether appellant was indigent, and whether counsel had abandoned this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). On January 25, 2021, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law was filed in this court. The trial court found that appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, appellant is indigent, and appellate counsel has not abandoned the appeal. We, therefore, ORDER this appeal reinstated on the docket of this court.
Counsel for appellant has filed the appellant’s brief and it is deemed filed on the date of this reinstatement order.
_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of January, 2021.
___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles W. Eaden v. State (Charles W. Eaden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.