Charles v. Williamson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 4, 2003
Docket03-6682
StatusUnpublished

This text of Charles v. Williamson (Charles v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles v. Williamson, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6682

MATTHEW OTIS CHARLES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TROY WILLIAMSON, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-03-104-5)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 4, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Otis Charles, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Matthew Otis Charles, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his petition styled as an application under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. See Charles v. Williamson, No. CA-03-104-5 (S.D.W.

Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Charles v. Williamson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-v-williamson-ca4-2003.