Charles v. Williamson
This text of Charles v. Williamson (Charles v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6682
MATTHEW OTIS CHARLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TROY WILLIAMSON, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-03-104-5)
Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 4, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Otis Charles, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Matthew Otis Charles, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his petition styled as an application under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. See Charles v. Williamson, No. CA-03-104-5 (S.D.W.
Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles v. Williamson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-v-williamson-ca4-2003.