Charles v. Vance
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-40602 Summary Calendar
EDWARD C. CHARLES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CAROL S. VANCE, Chairman, Texas Board of Criminal Justice; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:94-CV-136 - - - - - - - - - - April 22, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Edward C. Charles, Texas state prisoner # 627324, requests
permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the appeal of
the denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. Chief Judge Politz
ordered Charles to file an affidavit for leave to proceed IFP on
appeal pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
(PLRA). The order held Charles’ appeal in abeyance for 30 days
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40602 - 2 -
pending payment of the $105 filing fee or submittal of the
required documents pursuant to the PLRA. Charles timely
responded; however, the documentation submitted by Charles does
not comply with the requirements imposed by the PLRA because he
did not submit information regarding his prison trust account for
the required six-month period. See § 1915(a), (b). Accordingly,
Charles’ motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and
his appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.3. Should Charles wish to reinstate his appeal, he is
instructed to pay the $105 filing fee to the clerk of the
district court within 30 days from the date of this order.
MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles v. Vance (Charles v. Vance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.