Charles v. State

718 So. 2d 1264, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12716, 1998 WL 698599
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1998·No. No. 97-02060·Published

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

Charles Allen appeals his conviction for third-degree grand theft. Finding no reversible error, we affirm his conviction. However, as the State concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a $100 restitution award without a hearing. See Trice v. State, 655 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (reversing restitution that was imposed without affording defendant notice or opportunity to be heard on the amount). Accordingly, we affirm the conviction but reverse the restitution order and remand for a hearing.

Conviction affirmed; restitution order reversed; remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles v. State, 718 So. 2d 1264, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12716, 1998 WL 698599 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

718 So. 2d 1264 (Charles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trice v. State
655 So. 2d 1270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)