Charles v. State

489 So. 2d 782, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7718
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 1986·No. No. 85-1641·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand for a new trial because the trial court failed to hold the required hearing regarding the prosecutor’s admitted discovery violation. See Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).

REVERSED.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles v. State, 489 So. 2d 782, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7718 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

489 So. 2d 782 (Charles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thayer
489 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)