Charles v. Stansbury

3 Johns. 261
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 3 Johns. 261 (Charles v. Stansbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles v. Stansbury, 3 Johns. 261 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Opinion

Rule granted.

ON the application of A. B. to be admitted to an examination as an attorney of this court, the certificate of clerkship by the attorney was, that the clerk “ had regularly pursued the study of the law, under his direction and superintendance,” &c. The court said that the certificate was insufficient; that the attorney ought to certify that the clerk has served his clerkship, regularly, in the office of such attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vohlers v. E. H. Stafford Manufacturing Co.
137 N.W. 128 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Losee v. Dolan
74 N.Y.S. 685 (New York County Courts, 1902)
Meares v. Finlayson
32 S.E. 986 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1899)
Arnold v. Nye
23 Mich. 286 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1871)
Bissell v. Bissell
11 Barb. 96 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
State Bank v. Seawell
18 Ala. 616 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1851)
Estis v. Rawlins
5 Miss. 258 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1840)
Levy v. Boas
18 S.C.L. 217 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1831)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-v-stansbury-nysupct-1808.