Charles v. Stansbury
This text of 3 Johns. 261 (Charles v. Stansbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rule granted.
ON the application of A. B. to be admitted to an examination as an attorney of this court, the certificate of clerkship by the attorney was, that the clerk “ had regularly pursued the study of the law, under his direction and superintendance,” &c. The court said that the certificate was insufficient; that the attorney ought to certify that the clerk has served his clerkship, regularly, in the office of such attorney.
Mr. Justice Thompson was absent during the whole of this term, from indisposition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Johns. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-v-stansbury-nysupct-1808.