Charles v. Scarbrough

Missouri Court of Appeals

Charles v. Scarbrough

887 S.W.2d 820

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 1994·No. No. WD 49180·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Margaret Scarbrough, appeals following a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Charles and Diana Johnston. Defendant complains that the court erred in failing to grant a mistrial after the investigating officer injected insurance into the case when he testified to insurance papers he located in the defendant’s vehicle. The defendant further claims the trial court erroneously instructed the jury.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Margaret Scarbrough, appeals following a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Charles and Diana Johnston. Defendant complains that the court erred in failing to grant a mistrial after the investigating officer injected insurance into the case when he testified to insurance papers he located in the defendant’s vehicle. The defendant further claims the trial court erroneously instructed the jury.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Charles v. Scarbrough, 887 S.W.2d 820 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

887 S.W.2d 820 (Charles v. Scarbrough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.