Charles v. Newark Fire Insurance

235 A.D. 761

This text of 235 A.D. 761 (Charles v. Newark Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles v. Newark Fire Insurance, 235 A.D. 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the grounds: 1. That there was a failure on the part of the plaintiff to comply with’ the terms of the policy in submitting a verified proof of loss. 2. That it was conclusively proved that the provision in the policy as to a lock on the car was paid for and, under the language of the policy, the failure to furnish such a lock constituted a defense. All concur. Present —■ Sears, P. J., Taylor, Bdgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

[762]*762Order affirmed, with costs. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-v-newark-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-1932.