Charles v. M'Leod

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Charles v. M'Leod

2 S.C.L. 407

DecidedJuly 1, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 2 S.C.L. 407 (Charles v. M'Leod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles v. M'Leod, 2 S.C.L. 407 (S.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

After due consideration, the Judges were of opinion, that this was not one of those kind of motions which came regularly before a single judge at chambers, but should be [408]*408granted by the court, where the proceedings are filed and on record, sedente curia.

The defendants then moved for leave to plead double, but this motion was refused, on the ground that this court had no original jurisdiction, only an appellate one; consequently, the defendants must make their motion for this or~ cler in the circuit court below.

Present, GRIMKE, JoHNSoN, TREZEVANT and BREVARD

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After due consideration, the Judges were of opinion, that this was not one of those kind of motions which came regularly before a single judge at chambers, but should be [408]*408granted by the court, where the proceedings are filed and on record, sedente curia.

The defendants then moved for leave to plead double, but this motion was refused, on the ground that this court had no original jurisdiction, only an appellate one; consequently, the defendants must make their motion for this or~ cler in the circuit court below.

Present, GRIMKE, JoHNSoN, TREZEVANT and BREVARD

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 S.C.L. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-v-mleod-scctapp-1802.