Charles v. KLEMICK AND GAMPEL, PA

984 So. 2d 563, 2008 WL 2065980
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 2008
Docket2D07-4335
StatusPublished

This text of 984 So. 2d 563 (Charles v. KLEMICK AND GAMPEL, PA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles v. KLEMICK AND GAMPEL, PA, 984 So. 2d 563, 2008 WL 2065980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

984 So.2d 563 (2008)

Tileus CHARLES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gerta Charles, deceased, Appellant,
v.
KLEMICK AND GAMPEL, P.A., Appellee.

No. 2D07-4335.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2008.
Rehearing Denied June 25, 2008.

James J. Zonas, Naples, for Appellant.

Ross Bennett Gampel of Klemick and Gampel, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order awarding attorney's fees.

Klemick and Gampel's claim for fees was based on a contingency fee agreement signed by a person who had no authority to sign the agreement and by a minor, who lacks the capacity to enter into a contract, see Global Travel Marketing, Inc. v. Shea, *564 908 So.2d 392, 402 (Fla.2005) (citing Lee v. Thompson 124 Fla. 494, 168 So. 848 (1936)); In re T.W., 551 So.2d 1186, 1201 (Fla.1989) (Overton, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part). Klemick and Gampel failed to file a claim for alternative relief, and therefore, they are foreclosed from an award of attorney's fees.

The record before this court does not contain a contingent fee agreement with attorney Zonas, but the transcript of the hearing contains testimony by Tileus Charles that he signed papers retaining Zonas. There appeared to be no dispute during oral argument that attorney Zonas had a contingent fee agreement with Charles.

Accordingly, we reverse the award of attorney's fees and remand for the trial court to determine the amount of fees to which attorney Zonas is entitled pursuant to a valid agreement.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

WHATLEY and STRINGER, JJ., and DAKAN, STEPHEN L, Associate Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Global Travel Marketing, Inc. v. Shea
908 So. 2d 392 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Lee v. Thompson
168 So. 848 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
In re T.W.
551 So. 2d 1186 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
984 So. 2d 563, 2008 WL 2065980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-v-klemick-and-gampel-pa-fladistctapp-2008.