Charles v. DSCYF/DFS
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SIMON CHARLES,1 § §
Respondent-Below, § No. 552, 2017 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § in and for New Castle County DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES § FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND § File Nos. CN 13-03059 & THEIR FAMILIES/DIVISION OF § 17-10-02TN FAMILY SERVICES § (DSCYF/DFS), § Petition Nos. 16-30535 & § 17-30444 Petitioner-Below, § Appellee. § §
IN THE INTEREST OF: § SARAH FULLERTON- § CHARLES. §
Submitted: September 12, 2018 Decided: September 24, 2018
Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
This 24th day of September, 2018, after careful consideration of the
parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the
reasons stated in its November 28, 2017 order.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the
Family Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.
Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles v. DSCYF/DFS (Charles v. DSCYF/DFS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.