Charles v. Bishoff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Charles v. Bishoff

1 A. 572, 1 Sadler 260, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 672

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 9, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 A. 572 (Charles v. Bishoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles v. Bishoff, 1 A. 572, 1 Sadler 260, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 672 (Pa. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The book was not offered in evidence as one of original entries. It was in connection with, and corroborative of, the parol evidence. It was properly received.

If the jury committed an error in returning a verdict for a sum greater than the evidence justified, the corrective power was in the court below. It was an error of fact, which we cannot correct here. There is no error in law.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The book was not offered in evidence as one of original entries. It was in connection with, and corroborative of, the parol evidence. It was properly received.

If the jury committed an error in returning a verdict for a sum greater than the evidence justified, the corrective power was in the court below. It was an error of fact, which we cannot correct here. There is no error in law.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A. 572, 1 Sadler 260, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-v-bishoff-pa-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack