Charles v. Bezio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Charles v. Bezio

80 A.D.3d 975, 913 N.Y.S.2d 925

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 2011·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. Given that petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Avincola v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1672 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 711 [2010]; Matter of Perez v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1606 [2010]).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. Given that petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Avincola v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1672 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 711 [2010]; Matter of Perez v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1606 [2010]).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Charles v. Bezio, 80 A.D.3d 975, 913 N.Y.S.2d 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

80 A.D.3d 975 (Charles v. Bezio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related