Charles Tallmon v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: September 26, 2012
• Docket: 08-11-00141-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

' CHARLES TALLMON, No. 08-11-00141-CR ' Appellant, Appeal from ' v. County Criminal Court No. 1 ' THE STATE OF TEXAS, of El Paso County, Texas ' Appellee. ' (TC # 20100C09869)

OPINION

Charles Tallmon appeals his conviction of disregarding a stop sign. See

TEX.TRANSP.CODE ANN. § 544.010 (West 2011). We vacate the trial court’s judgment and

render a judgment dismissing the appeal from the justice court.

FACTUAL SUMMARY

An El Paso County Deputy Sheriff issued a citation to Appellant for failure to stop at a

stop sign. Appellant holds a commercial driver’s license (CDL) and was operating a non-

commercial vehicle at the time of the offense. Consequently, he is not eligible to take a driver’s

safety course or receive deferred adjudication. See TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art.

45.0511(s)(1)(West Supp. 2012). Appellant filed a motion in the justice court challenging the

constitutionality of the statute making him ineligible to receive deferred adjudication or to take a

driver’s safety course. Appellant also filed a written plea of nolo contendere. The record before

us does not reflect that the justice court entered a judgment in this case. The official record of

the justice court contains a form document titled “Judge’s Trial Notes.” Appellant’s name, the

justice court cause number, and the offense are set forth at the top of the form. The remainder of the form contains sections concerning the defendant’s plea, the judgment (guilty, not guilty, and

deferred adjudication), failure to appear, and dismissal of the case. The justice court can enter

the amount of the fine and court costs on the form and includes several lines on which the court

can record notes about the case. The phrase “hold for a few days” is handwritten in this section.

Just above the line for the judge’s signature is the notation “(FINAL) JUDGMENT” and lines

next to the words “Guilty,” “Not Guilty,” and “Dismissed” for the court to indicate the

disposition of the case. The judge neither indicated the disposition nor signed the form. Despite

the absence of a judgment, Appellant filed an appeal bond and the justice court forwarded a

transcript of the case to the County Criminal Court No. 1 of El Paso County, Texas. The County

Court at Law conducted a trial de novo and Appellant again challenged the constitutionality of

the statute making him ineligible for deferred adjudication or to take a driver’s safety course.

The court found Appellant guilty of disregarding a stop sign and assessed a fine of $200. This

appeal followed.

JURISDICTION

Appellant’s sole issue on appeal is that Section 45.0511 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure violates his right to equal protection by prohibiting a holder of a commercial driver’s

license who is cited for a traffic violation while driving a non-commercial vehicle from obtaining

a dismissal after successfully completing a driver’s safety course. The State first argues that the

county court at law did not have jurisdiction of the appeal from the justice court and should have

dismissed the case because the justice court did not enter a judgment.

Appeals from a justice court must be heard in county court. TEX.CODE

CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 4.08 (West 2005)(providing that the county courts shall have appellate

jurisdiction in criminal cases of which justice courts and other inferior courts have original

-2- jurisdiction); TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 45.042 (West 2006)(providing that appeals

from a justice or municipal court, including appeals from final judgments in bond forfeiture

proceedings, shall be heard by the county court except in cases where the county court has no

jurisdiction, in which counties such appeals shall be heard by the proper court). County Criminal

Court No. 1 of El Paso County is a statutory county court. TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. §

25.0731(a)(1)(8)(West Supp. 2012). If the appeal is not taken from a court of record, the trial is

de novo. TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 45.042(b).

An appeal from the justice court is perfected when the appeal bond is filed with the

justice or judge who tried the case not later than the 10th day after the date the judgment was

entered. TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 45.0426(a). The appeal bond must recite that the

defendant was convicted and has appealed. TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 45.0425(b).

Further, the bond must be in an amount not less than two times the amount of the fine and costs

adjudged against the defendant. TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 45.0425(a). Thus, the

existence of a valid and enforceable municipal court judgment is a prerequisite to confer

appellate jurisdiction on a county court for the purpose of a trial de novo. Lipscomb v. Randall,

985 S.W.2d 601, 607 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 1999, pet. dism’d), citing State v. Campbell, 820

S.W.2d 44, 46 (Tex.App.--Austin 1991, pet. ref’d).

Appellant states in his brief that he was convicted in the justice court but the appellate

record does not support this assertion. The official record of the justice court transmitted to the

County Criminal Court No. 1 does not reflect that the justice court entered a final judgment.

Consequently, the County Criminal Court No. 1 did not have jurisdiction of the appeal. We

vacate the judgment of the County Criminal Court No. 1 and render judgment dismissing the

appeal taken by Appellant from the justice court to the County Criminal Court No. 1.

-3- September 26, 2012 _______________________________________________ ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

-4-