Charles T. Wilson Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 73, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 9, 1949
DocketC. D. 1163
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 Cust. Ct. 73 (Charles T. Wilson Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles T. Wilson Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 73, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227 (cusc 1949).

Opinion

Cline, Judge:

This is a protest, arising at the port of New York, against the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise described in the invoice .as “onion powder” and “sliced dehydrated onions” at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as vegetables, prepared, not specially provided for. It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 781 as spices, not specially provided for, or at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 as a nonenumerated manufactured article, or at 2K cents per pound under paragraph 770 as onions.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act are as follows:

Par. 775. Vegetables (including horseradish), if cut, sliced, or otherwise reduced in size, or if reduced to flour, or if parched or roasted, or if pickled, or packed in salt, brine, oil, or prepared or preserved in any other way and not specially provided for; * * * 35 per centum ad valorem; * * *.
[74]*74Par. 770. Onions, 2J4 cents per pound; garlic, 1% cents per pound.
Par. 781. Spices and spice seeds: Cassia, cassia buds, and cassia vera, ground, 6 cents per pound; cloves, ground, 6 cents per pound; clove stems, ground, 5 cents per pound; cinnamon.and cinnamon chips, ground, 5 cents per pound; ginger root, not preserved o.r candied, ground, 5 cents per pound; mace, ground, 8 cents per pound; Bombay, or wild mace, unground, 18 cents per pound; ground, 22 cents per pound; mustard seeds (whole), 2 cents per pound; mustard, ground or prepared in bottles or otherwise, 10 cents per pound; nutmegs, ground, 5 cents per pound; pepper, capsicum or red pepper or cáyenne pepper, unground, 6 cents per pound; ground, 8 cents per pound; paprika, ground or unground, 5 cents per pound; black or white pepper, ground, 5 cents per pound; pimento (allspice), ground, 3 cents per pound; sage, unground, 1 cent per pound; ground, 3 cents per pound; curry and curry powder, 5 cents per pound; mixed spices, and spices and spice seeds not specially provided for, including all herbs or herb leaves in glass or other small packages, for culinary use, 25 per centum ad valorem: * * *
Par. 1558. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of all raw or unmanufactured articles not enumerated or provided for, a duty of 10 per centum ad valorem, and on all articles manufactured, in whole or in part, not specially provided for, a duty of 20 per centum ad valorem.

At the trial Lloyd M. Trafford, vice president of Charles T. Wilson Co., Inc., testified that, the merchandise herein consisted of 95 tins of dehydrated onion powder and 701 tins of dehydrated sliced onions imported from Mexico; that he had seen the manufacturing process in Mexico; that powdered onions were prepared by dehydrating onions and grinding them; that sliced onions were prepared by slicing onions and running them through a dehydrater; that the initial product in both operations was the common onion; that the customers to whom onion powder was sold were in the spice business; that they would take material such as onion powder and process it for food seasonings as a spice; that the witness had tasted-and eaten products containing onion powder and sliced dehydrated onion; that they give relish to food, and gratify the taste; that they are pungent and appetizing substances; that he considered them to be aromatic vegetable substances; that in his opinion they are spices.

On cross-examination the witness stated that he had seen spice lists upon which onion salt and garlic salt were listed as spices for seasoning; that onion salt is onion powder mixed with salt; that housewives use onion salt in cooking; that he had never seen onion powder as such used by housewives.

Charles Schnurman, a salesman employed by J. Raphael & Son, testified that his company received a shipment of onion powder from Charles T. Wilson Co., Inc., in June or July of 1943; that he sold that shipment to sausage manufacturers; that sausage manufacturers make frankfurters, bologna, meat loaf, liverwurst, hams, spiced beefs, and combinations of meats and gravies; that he had seen his customers use onion powder; that in making sausage, they grind up the meat, add water or ice, then add seasoning, such as pepper, nutmeg, mace, [75]*75cardamom, and dehydrated or powdered onion; that he brings home samples of onion powder and his wife uses it on chicken and roast meats; that onion powder gives relish to food, gratifies the taste, and is a pungent and appetizing substance; that in his opinion it is a seasoning; that in the trade it is referred to as a seasoning or flavor and is considered a spice.

On cross-examination the witness stated that this merchandise is invoiced as onion powder; that it is always bought and sold as onion powder; that when he eats meat or chicken prepared with onion powder, he tastes the onion; that onion powder makes the product tastier; that without it the dish tastes flat; that the merchandise is used in the condition as imported by sausage manufacturers; that it is not used as an ingredient but as a seasoning; that it brings out the flavor of the frankfurter; that in his opinion the ordinary onion is a vegetable.

Defendant called Technical Sergeant Joseph Meinohl, who testified that he had been a- cook in civilian life and had operated his own restaurant from 1937 to 1942; that he entered the Army in March 1942 and had served as cook, mess sergeant, mess co-ordinator, mess adviser, instructor for cooks, and is now food-service technician and mess adviser; that he has made onion soup; that either fresh or dehydrated onions can be used in it; that under normal conditions fresh onions are used; that fresh onions are used in western omelets and creamed onions. A fist of dishes was then read to the witness who stated that he had made them all and that they had one ingredient in common; namely, onions; that normally fresh onions are used in those dishes, but that dehydrated onions are used in field operations and overseas; that they are a substitute for fresh onions and are used for the same purpose; that the fundamental use of the dehydrated onion is as a vegetable.

On cross-examination the "witness stated that when creamed onions are prepared with the use of dehydrated onions, the result is shreds of onion in a cream sauce; that in preparing creamed onions for 100 men, 12% pounds of fresh onions or 1 pound of dehydrated onions would be used; that a little more flour would be used with dehydrated onions to give more body to the dish; that dehydrated onions may be used wherever fresh onions can be used for flavoring and seasoning purposes; that the use of dehydrated onions gives relish to foods; that it gratifies the taste; that he does not consider dehydrated onions a direct seasoning but a by-flavor, that is, they improve the flavor of the particular dish in which they are used.

Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable under paragraph 770 as onions on the ground that the eo nomine provision includes all forms of the article. Defendant contends, on the other [76]*76hand, that the legislative history and judicial decisions in regard to onions indicate that the provision in paragraph 770 is limited to onions in their natural state.

The general rule was stated in Nootka Packing Co. v. United States, 22 C. C. P. A. 464, T. D. 47464, as follows (p. 470):

The clear weight of the authorities on the subject is that an

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sokol v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 25 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)
Schoenfeld & Sons v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 177 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Cust. Ct. 73, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-t-wilson-co-v-united-states-cusc-1949.