Charles T. Sherwin v. United States of America Donald L. Robinson, and State of North Carolina

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23477, 1995 WL 373226
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 1995
Docket94-2632
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Charles T. Sherwin v. United States of America Donald L. Robinson, and State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles T. Sherwin v. United States of America Donald L. Robinson, and State of North Carolina, 59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23477, 1995 WL 373226 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles T. SHERWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Donald L. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees,
and
STATE of North Carolina, Defendant.

No. 94-2632.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.

Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, Office of The United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his civil action on res judicata grounds, imposing a prefiling injunction, and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. United States, No. CA-94-48-3-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 11 & 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherwin v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 672 (Federal Claims, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23477, 1995 WL 373226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-t-sherwin-v-united-states-of-america-donal-ca4-1995.